However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant is a person who distributes the seal system, scambling, etc. with the trade name “D” in Jeonju-si Seoul Special Metropolitan City C.

No person shall commit an act of causing confusion with another person's goods by using any one identical or similar to another person's trademark widely known in the Republic of Korea or a mark indicating another person's goods, or by selling goods using such one.

피고인은 2016. 7. 경부터 2017. 3. 21. 경까지 위 장소에서, E으로부터 구입하여 보관하던 국내에 널리 인식된 피해자 대원 미디어㈜ 의 ‘ 원피스 캐릭터’ 피 규 어, 센과 치 히로의 행방 불명의 ‘가 오나 시’ 봉제 인형, 피해자 ㈜ 포켓 몬 코리아의 ‘ 피 카 츄’ 봉제 인형, 피해자 네 티브㈜ 의 ‘ 보글 젤’, ‘ 포 이팟’ 봉제 인형을 피고인의 인터넷 카페 등을 통하여 물건을 판매하여 위 기간 동안 불상 액( 피고인 주장 약 3억 원) 의 매출을 올리는 등 피해자들이 국내에서 판매하는 위 캐릭터와 혼동하게 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police against E or F;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G;

1. Police seizure protocol (Evidence No. 41);

1. Investigation report (related to the classification of seized articles), the details of classification of seized articles, and the classification and photographs of seized articles;

1. A report on investigation (related to attachment of an agent’s written opinion), and an agent’s written opinion;

1. Reports on internal investigation (related to submission of documents for reference) and photographs of the defendant's operating site;

1. Domestic history reports (related to the attachment of data submitted by Montreal Korea), each license agreement, each confirmation of household effects, and the original register of trademark registration;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the reporting of internal history (related to the attachment of data submitted by NEB), the production of brand products, and requests for punishment to illegal distributors;

1. Article 18(3)1 of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act and Article 18(3)1 of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act for facts constituting an offense (for each victim) and subparagraph 1 (a) of Article 2 of the same Act.