2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

A. On September 18, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a motion against the Defendants for a trial to confirm the scope of the right of the instant Claim No. 1 with the Intellectual Property Tribunal on the grounds that “the invention subject to confirmation does not include all the elements of the instant Claim No. 1, and thus, the invention subject to confirmation does not fall under the scope of the right of the instant Claim No. 1.” 2) The Intellectual Property Tribunal deliberated on the said trial to confirm the scope of the right of the instant Claim No. 1 as 2015Da4688, and subsequently, on November 30, 2015, the said trial decision was rendered to dismiss the Plaintiff’s petition on the grounds that “the invention subject to confirmation is identical to the elements of the instant Claim No. 1, the invention subject to confirmation falls under the scope of the right of the instant Claim No.

B. The title of the patented invention (A) invention of this case (C2)/registration date/registration number: D/E/F) technical field of the patented invention of this case is related to a device for reducing the leakage of productive liquid amount. In particular, it is related to a device for detecting the leakage of obsive toxic chemical ingredients, such as sulfur, salt, nitrogen, and implosion, etc. (b) previous technology problems are related to a device for reducing the leakage of obsive chemical ingredients, such as yellow acid (001).

The purpose of the instant patent invention is to provide a device for detecting the leakage of the amount of acid, which has been made by the Dora to act through the Dora, only when the amount of rainfall is leaked (number / 009). (d) The apparatus for detecting the leakage of the amount of acid used in the invention to achieve the above purpose is the Berne film floor with film material; and (e) the Berne film floor with the Dora to achieve the above purpose.