beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.09.01 2016고단951

상습특수절도

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

One (Evidence No. 4) of seized net value, and one of the color rubber materials.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 8, 2001, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for special larceny in the Dong branch of the Seoul District Court, and two years for imprisonment with prison labor in the Seoul District Court on August 28, 2003 for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny). On February 15, 2006, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny). On April 11, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court on April 11, 2008, and on June 22, 2012, the execution of the sentence was terminated in the Chungcheong District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 01:50 on May 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with precious metal equivalent to approximately KRW 25 million in total of the market prices, including 65 and 65 and 1 earbs (14K) owned by the victim, who was in possession of the store by destroying the front glass of the store and intrusion into the screen, and was placed in the display stand.

The Defendant habitually stolen or attempted to steals property worth KRW 4,9320,000 from May 10, 2016 to May 18, 2016, as indicated in the list of crimes, from around 22 times to around 10, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, F, G, H, and I;

1. Each written statement of J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, S, T, U,V, W, and X;

1. On-site photographs and investigation reports (the investigation of the addition of a suspected suspect);

1. Seizure records;

1. Records before judgment: Criminal history records, etc., inquiry reports and data on the current status of personal identification;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, method of number of crimes, frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been systematically repeated;

1. Relevant Articles 32, 331 (1), 330, 329, and 342 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (including habitual larcenys);

1. Aggravation for repeated crimes;