beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.02.20 2017고단3505

사기등

Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,00,00,00, respectively, for eight months, and for Defendant C’s agricultural partnership.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In order to strengthen the competitiveness of the livestock industry by facilitating the production and use of domestic research fees, reducing production costs, etc., the Changwon-si implements the “project to support research fees production equipment (management body)” to support the purchase cost of the production site of the research fees (such as wood and dried, etc. with high textile content, and low energy content) and select the subject of the support project at the request of the subsidized project operator for producers, such as agricultural partnership corporations. The ratio of the self-payment out of the total project cost of 50-60% of the total project cost shall be changed from 50-60% each year according to the decision to grant subsidies from Changwon-si each year, and after completing the project, the victim shall be paid the remainder of the project cost less the self-payment.

An agricultural partnership for such selection as a subsidy program operator shall have at least KRW 100 million, and at least five members shall be appointed, and the members shall have a track record of collaborative management of agriculture and conducting research fees business for at least one year.

In addition, the subsidized project operator should faithfully perform the subsidized project with the care of a good manager in accordance with the laws, regulations, purpose of granting subsidies, details and conditions of the subsidized project, and not engage in any unfair act related to the subsidy, and should not jointly use and manage the agricultural machinery purchased with the subsidy, and should not be justified.

【Defendant A’s representative director of the said farming association corporation; Defendant B’s director of the said farming association corporation; Defendant C’s farming association corporation (hereinafter “C”); and Defendant C’s farming association corporation (hereinafter “Defendant C”)’s production and sale of research fees in connection with the livestock supply of food by producing the plant products of a breeding farm corporation around May 11, 2010; and the livestock industry complex development project.