2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Defendant is a terrestrial broadcasting company that broadcasts “C”, and the Plaintiff was a police officer first appointed on June 3, 2010 and served in the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency E Team at the Sial Police Station from July 12, 2017 to January 25, 2018.

B. The Defendant, on June 4, 2018, posted a report of the title “F” in the “D” program (hereinafter “instant report”). The content of the instant report is as shown in attached Table 2.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant reported the following facts: (a) the Defendant, who was arrested at the time, attempted to smoke; (b) did not take a cigarette smoking; (c) did not have any desire to sing and assault the police officer, and did not have any intent to obstruct the performance of official duties; and (d) did not directly appear for the purpose of obstructing the performance of official duties; (c) the Defendant: (a) reported the fact that the Defendant: (a) prevented the Plaintiff from avoiding the suspect who attempted to smoke only and intentionally covered the Defendant’s name; (d) recorded the phone call without the Plaintiff’s consent; and (b) made the Plaintiff reproduce as if the Plaintiff responded to the interview, thereby impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation and infringing on the right to voice.

Therefore, the defendant has a duty to make corrective reports and damages.

3. Determination

A. According to the attached Form 2 as to the determination on a request for a corrective statement, the report of this case contains the following facts: “A bread G s in alcohol have continuously smoked in the atmosphere,” and police officers met the so-called “after plucking, plucking, and plucking up two locks using the two locks,” and “G cs suffered eight (8) cs in spine in spine frame in this process. As G cs appeal for pain and resist, the police officers added charges that interfered with the performance of official duties to the instant report.”