For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendants on the ground that there was no proof of crime regarding the charge of fraud on August 25, 2012, and the charge of forging private documents and exercising the above investigation documents against Defendant C among the facts charged in the instant case.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the crime of forging private documents, and the crime of forging the above investigation documents.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but there is no evidence of objection to the remainder of the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.