2. The plaintiff's defendant.

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The plaintiff filed a claim against the defendant D, and the defendant D possessed the above real estate as the owner of the real estate indicated in the attached Form 2 located in the project implementation district of the redevelopment project for the housing redevelopment project implemented by the plaintiff, who did not file an application for parcelling-out notwithstanding the plaintiff's public announcement of application for parcelling-out. The plaintiff acquired the right to use and profit from the above real estate as the management and disposal plan of the above housing redevelopment project was announced on August 29, 2017. Since the plaintiff acquired the right to use and profit from the above real estate by depositing the compensation after receiving a decision of expropriation from the local Land Tribunal of Gyeonggi-do, the defendant D has the obligation to deliver the above real estate to the plaintiff. Thus, since there is no evidence to acknowledge the possession of the above real estate by the defendant D,

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant D is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.