When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant

A was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on June 19, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 20, 2014.

Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant dealt with phiphones as follows:

1. On September 2013, the Defendant sold Handphones to D through E and sold approximately 1.6g of Handphones in the world near C in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and D’s 500,000 won as the purchase price.

2. Provision of Handphones;

A. On October 2013, the Defendant provided Dolphones to Police Officers in Daegu on October 2013, the Defendant provided them with approximately 0.1g of philphones free of charge at a non-permanent expressway rest area, and D with approximately 0.1g of philphones at a non-permanent expressway rest area.

B. On November 2013, 2013, the Defendant provided Handphones to Police Officers on the following occasions: (a) in the mutual influence room located in the New-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul; (b) in D, upon request, the Defendant sent a large amount of Handphones to D; and (c) D, around 03:00 on the same day, left a rophones in the fluence market located in the vicinity of the Han-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul; and (d) had F find it.

Accordingly, the defendant provided philophones in collusion with D.

(c)

On February 2, 2014, the Defendant offered approximately 0.8g of philophones to D without compensation from the mutual influorial sects located in the Newcomondong, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, to provide it.

3. On February 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had D purchase 300,000 won from G in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu; and (b) had D purchase 300,000 won by delivery of approximately 0.8 grams from J as the purchase price.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with D to purchase philophones.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D by each prosecution;

1. Statement made to K in the police statement;

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seized articles, and photographs of seized articles;