체류기간연장등불허가처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the modification of the pertinent part of the judgment of the first instance as stated in the following 2. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. In the second 9 pages of the revised portion, the Defendant added “A” in front of “A”, “The Plaintiff has filed an application for the extension of the period of stay on September 13, 2017, and filed an application for extension of the period of stay.”
2. The 10th place "non-permission disposition such as extension of sojourn period, etc." shall be deemed "disposition which does not allow it".
2 The 11th page "B 1 to 8" shall be raised with "B 1 to 9".
3 Under the 3 pages, the term "granted" shall be read as "assigned".
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.