A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

On July 2006, the Defendants introduced that “The 29th husband and wife who was in the United States of America and went to Korea for the meeting” at the place of a regular meeting held by the FIE in Seoul, which was held in the middle of July 2006 at the FIE, the Defendants attempted to receive money for the purpose of receiving permanent residence from the victims’ husband and wife or the victims’ husband and wife during the class hours.”

At around August 10, 2006, the Defendants: “I” restaurant located in Seoul E, Defendant B had the victim’s husband and wife “I, there is an attorney-at-law who has been fluent to our church located in the United States, and I talk about the body so that I would legally acquire the right of permanent residence for the children of the party.” The Defendant A took the attitude of doing so and fluencing the body.

However, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to allow the victims to acquire permanent residence in the United States.

The defendants deceiving the couple of the victims as such, and deceiving them, the victim H for the acquisition of permanent sovereignty from the victim H.

8.24.A around 24.24.20 U.S. dollars 10,000 equivalent to the market value of 9,733,400 U.S. dollars

9.7.Around July, 200, received US$ 30,000 equivalent to the market value of 29,209,200 at the same account.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, J and K;

1. The defendants' major changes in each of the Defendants' entries in e-mail copies, e-mail 20 copies, and e-mail 1 copies, and e-mail respectively, were to have disbursed 40,000 U.S. dollars in relation to the labor permits in the U.S. against K in the U.S., so there was no deception of the victim.