beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.04.27 2017고단410

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and two months in Jeju District Court on August 25, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in Jeju Prison on November 11, 2016.

around 02:30 on February 23, 2017, the Defendant entered the victim D in Jeju Island, which was operated by the victim D, and ordered alcohol and alcohol as if he would pay the drinking value normally.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to pay the drinking value because he did not have to pay 30,000 won in cash, and there was no other means of settlement such as credit cards.

As above, the Defendant was provided with an amount equivalent to KRW 120,00,000, such as the one-half of each share by deceiving the victim as above, and the one-half of each share by the victim.

"2017 Highest 621"

1. Fraud;

A. On February 10, 2017, at around 01:33, the Defendant: (a) boarded a G taxi operated by the Victim F on the roads adjacent to the citizen hall located in the Dong-dong on Jeju-si; and (b) left the destination, the Defendant, as if he were to pay the taxi fee, went to the roads adjacent to his residence, which are adjacent to H, as if he were to pay the taxi fee.

However, the defendant did not have any means of payment such as cash or card, and there was no intention or ability to pay taxi charges.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and let the victim operate the taxi to the destination, but did not pay 12,120 won for the taxi fee, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount of money.

B. On February 18, 2017, around 19:00, the Defendant entered the K main points operated by the Victim J in Jeju at Jeju, and ordered both states and State as if they would pay the drinking value normally.

However, in fact, the cash possessed by the Defendant was less than KRW 100,000, and there was no other means of settlement, such as credit card, and there was no intention or ability to pay the liquor value.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and is against the victim.