However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 7, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 00:04, at the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the Victim C (the other, 57 years old); (b) at the head of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the Victim C (the other, 57 years old); (c) at the head of the “D” house, the Defendant took a horse to female customers who had drinking alcohol, and told the victim with a large interest to the victim who read it; and (d) at the same time, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s heading work by 50 minutes, such as drinking, drinking, drinking, and drinking, and drinking, and drinking, on the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Photographs of the scene of crime;

1. Application of statutes to the results of viewing video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The fact that under the influence of breath of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the defendant was guilty of having been punished several times for violent crimes, including obstructing the performance of his duties, and obstructing the performance of duties: Provided, That the punishment shall be determined by taking into account all the circumstances of the arguments and the records of the instant case, including the accused's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.