From May 24, 2014 to 21:50 the same day from May 24, 2014, the Defendant occupied the eight lanes prior to the eight lanes in the way that one-way, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, occupied the 1,00 conference participants and two-way-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the traffic of vehicles using the roadway in common with the participants in the assembly.

2. Among the evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor, there are DNA statements attached to the report of internal investigation as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case, requests for provision of communication data (report of execution results), information situation report, and photographs.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, the evidence alone can only recognize the fact that a photograph taken by a large number of people is taken by the police in the vicinity of the front door of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, where the Defendant occupies the road along the road as indicated in the facts charged, and the facts charged in the instant case that the Defendant interfered with traffic, such as the statement in the facts charged, was proven to the extent

It is difficult to see it.

가. 피고인은 2014. 5. 24. 청계 광장에서 열린 세월 호 추모 집회에 참가하였으나 집회 후 행진에는 참여한 바 없고, 이후 개인적인 용무를 보고 다시 보신각으로 돌아왔는데 길이 막혀 있고 차량 통행이 없어 잠시 차로를 가로질러 길을 건넜을 뿐 도로를 점거한 바 없다고 주장하고 있다.

B. According to the police evidence photographs (Evidence Nos. 43 and 44 of the evidence records), the Defendant was taken in a number of figures near the Boli angle in the face of a large number of figures.

People belonging to photographs are in different directions, and they are front and rear of the location of the defendant.