However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) reported on the front of the restaurant of “D” in the name of “D” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-si, Seo-si, and called “D,” and called “D with a driver of Otobba,” (hereinafter referred to as “D”); and (b) collected a bucket that was cited by F in the circumstances leading to the E District of the police station, which was sent to the site, to stop him/her with a buck box; and (c) met the buck bucks of the above F; and (d) met with the part of the F F F’s buck lap.

“In doing so, the right edge of the F was assaulted by the right edge of the said F on one occasion by walking.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Gutical Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Where the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the types of determination], the scope of the punishment for interference with the performance of public duties, the first type (Interference with the performance of public duties and the coercion of duties) (special mitigated persons], the degree of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or obstruction of public duties is minor [the scope of the recommended punishment] mitigated area, one month to eight months;

2. The sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking into account various factors of sentencing, such as the nature of the sentence, degree of damage, the fact that the victimized police officer wishes to strong punishment, the fact that the defendant has been punished due to the crime of injury by violence, etc. and the external records of the crime, the age of the defendant, family relationship, and economic circumstances;