A. Prior to the R of Pyeongtaek-si Q (hereinafter “ Q”) that Defendant Pyeongtaek-si owned solely, KRW 586 (hereinafter “instant land before the instant land substitution”) was divided into KRW 416 and KRW 170 prior to S on March 21, 197.

B. Before R, 416 square meters: T 432.4 square meters and U 526.6 square meters; prior to S, 170 square meters were respectively substituted with V 343.8 square meters and W 214.9 square meters, respectively.

(hereinafter “instant land substitution”). C.

U large 526.6 square meters was divided into U large 204.6 square meters and X large 322 square meters on February 1, 1999, and T large 432.4 square meters was divided into T large 351.3 square meters and Y large 81.1 square meters on March 19, 2002.

V was divided into a P 187.2 square meters on January 28, 2015 (hereinafter “instant land”) and a V 156 square meters on 28, 2015.

E. The register of the land of this case is written by the Plaintiff, Defendant F, G, Pyeongtaek-si, H, Daeyang Mutual Saving and Finance Company, Daeyang Mutual Saving and Finance Company, J, Non-Party Z, and AA as their owners. On May 23, 2009, Defendant B, C, D, and E jointly succeeded to the above deceased on the ground that the deceased died on April 12, 200, and Defendant K, L, M, N, andO jointly succeeded to the above deceased on the ground that the deceased died on April 12, 200.

Each ownership share of the plaintiff and the defendants as to the land of this case shall be as specified in the attached Form.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute between the parties, entry in Gap evidence 1 to 11 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to claims against the remaining Defendants other than Defendant Pyeongtaek-si

(a) Defendant E orO: Judgment by each service by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

B. Defendant B, C, D, F, G, H, Daeyang Mutual Saving and Finance Company, I, J, K, L, M, and N: each confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

3. We examine the determination as to the claim against Defendant Pyeongtaek-si, and the following circumstances revealed in addition to the purport of the entire arguments based on the evidence presented earlier. In other words, Defendant Pyeongtaek-si specified the part of 81.1 square meter out of the land prior to the instant land substitution to the network Z and sold it to the network, and completed the registration of co-ownership transfer for convenience.