beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.30 2015나52663

손해배상(자)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the pertinent item, and thus cites it as it is in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 10-1 through 13, Gap evidence Nos. 14, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 6-1 through 3, the result of the physical examination commission and the result of the supplemental evaluation commission to the director of the Seoul Escar Hospital at the court of first instance, the fact inquiry to the director of the above hospital at the court of first instance, the result of the fact inquiry entrustment to the director of the Ksnae University, the purport of the whole pleadings.

(a) Personal data 1) Personal data: 12% of the total working age from the date following the date of calculating the amount of damages: 2) income and operation period: Urban daily wage of ordinary man, 3) latter disability and 25% of the labor capacity loss rate by later disability (1) 1) and (1) 25% of the permanent disability (4) 5% of the Mabrid Disability Assessment Table IV-1 (1) (5) of the Mabrid Disability Assessment Table 5) 12% of the total working age, 6% of the maximum working age, 3% of the permanent disability [5] 3-1 and (2) of the Mabrid Disability Assessment Table 5, 3) of the Malodrid Disability Assessment Table 3-1 (5) of the Malodrid Disability Assessment Table 5, 3) of the 196th Eloddrid Disability Evaluation Table 5, and the Plaintiff’s physical character and the results of the appraisal of the Seoul University 10th Elosion.