When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 27, 2017, around 04:26, the Defendant destroyed and damaged “D” clothes located in the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, by putting away objects in several instances, which are equivalent to KRW 150,00,00 in the market price of the Plaintiff, who was installed in the entrance entrance of the said clothes, without any particular reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on internal investigation (referring to the submission of damaged articles and photographs to the scene of damage), damaged photographs, internal investigation reports (referring to the statement of an employee of a guard company dispatched to the scene), and internal investigation reports (referring to the F counterpart of a studio);

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are disadvantageous to the defendant’s reason for sentencing in the workhouse: Although the defendant had a previous conviction for the same kind of crime several times, it does not mean that the defendant has damaged another’s property without any specific reason. Circumstances favorable to the failure to recover from damage: the defendant was recognized as committing a crime by the police. The defendant appears to have committed a crime in a somewhat abnormal state due to physical disability. Considering the following circumstances: the defendant’s age and occupation, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, as well as all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant’s age, occupation, sex and environment, motive and consequence of the crime