2. Although there are circumstances such as the defendant voluntarily attended the investigative agency and led to the confession of the crime of this case, the court of the court below seems to have already selected a fine in consideration of the above circumstances, the defendant had already been subject to criminal disposition, including punishment, for the same kind of crime over a hundreds of time, and the crime of this case also was committed during the period of repeated crime due to the previous narcotics crime; the frequency of medication of the crime of this case is not significant; the crime of this case like this case requires strict punishment since social harm is serious; and other circumstances that are the sentencing conditions indicated in the records such as the defendant's age, character, conduct, family relation, environment, occupation, circumstance and contents of the crime of this case, etc. are considered as being too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.