A Imprisonment for one year, two years of imprisonment for Defendant B, and one year and six months of imprisonment for Defendant C and D, and Defendant E.

[2017 Highest 782] The Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a violation of the Telecommunications Business Act on June 30, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 8, 2017. Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court on November 29, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 1, 2017.

【Criminal facts, the Defendants, and K, through the Internet, knew that Nonindicted 2 financial institutions could easily obtain loans from the said financial institutions when submitting the details of the workplace, resident registration certificates, and passbook transactions of the senior citizens of the society at the second financial institutions, and provided them with an advertisement, such as “a person to receive loans, a person to receive loans, and a person who may not be illegal, and may receive trust and loan.” On the part of the short term, the Defendants and K recruited victims who had contacted with the advertisements, including “an amount of money punishment, a portion of money punishment, and a portion of money punishment,” and recruited them as if the victims without the workplace were in the workplace, or created a fake workplace, or received monthly, weekly, or daily wages, by making false transaction details as if they were received on a regular basis, thereby making them borrow loans to the victims and making them divided into loans.

According to the above public offering, Defendant B and Defendant D are in charge of distributing the amount acquired by deceit from victims to Defendant C, A, and other accomplices. Defendant A made a false workplace to the victims who requested loan, and made contact with the victims at the telephone number of the above workplace in the lending company, even if the victims were to contact with the aforementioned false workplace, as if the victims were to work in the actual workplace, and made the loan by providing answers as if the victims were to work in the actual workplace, Defendant C and D raise the maximum limit of the principal bank's entry and withdrawal, and prepare documents necessary for the withdrawal of the bank, such as passbook and transaction details, etc., and the lending company.