However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 21:30 on September 22, 2018, the Defendant: “C main point located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, 2018.” “C,” sent to the site after receiving 112 reports, the Defendant: (a) sent the police box affiliated with the Seoul Southern Police Station Diplomatic Police Station that sent the Defendant for the same reason that he was arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of his duty; (b) sealed the Defendant’s arm on two occasions; and (c) collected a statement on this from the owner of the business that the F reported 112; and (d) told the F to read “I, f, f, f, f, f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Statement of a witness in the G preparation;

1. Each investigation report (to listen to the G phone statement of 112 reporter and to the closure of theCCTV screen);

1. Application of the CCTV closure Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The basic area (six months to one year and six months) of the punishment for the obstruction of performance of official duties according to the sentencing guidelines (no person shall be subject to a special punishment):

2. The severity of the crime committed by the police officer who received a report on the sentence 112 and received a notification of the sentence, in consideration of the degree of the assault, etc. as a result of the crime committed by the police officer who used violence;

On the other hand, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and there is no record of criminal punishment so far.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the age, occupation, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.