Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

A. On January 1, 1999, the Plaintiff (B) joined the Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Non-Party Company”) as a full-time employee and continued to work at the Daejeon Athrax.

B. On January 31, 2017, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as follows: (a) immediately after having arrived at a box at the warehouse, the hack pipe, which was being driven by the left-hand shoulder while getting off the box; and (b) immediately was treated in the off-to-door department D; and (c) thereafter, “The Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the left-hand string bed, the right-hand bed, the right-hand bed, the right-hand bed, the back bed, the back-hand bed, the back-hand bed, the upper-hand bed, the upper-hand bed, the left-hand bed, the left-hand bed, the right-hand bed, and the upper-hand bed.”

(c)

On July 27, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care benefits to “the left-hand kick-gun of the tunnel, the right-hand kick-gun, the right-hand knick-winger, the left-hand knick-winger, the left-hand knick-winger, and the left-hand knick-up

(d)

On September 28, 2017, the Defendant approved medical care without medical care (hereinafter “the instant disposition”) on the ground that the Defendant had a substantial causal relation with his duties with respect to “the left-hand hand-to-hand hand-to-hand hand-to-hand hand-to-hand hand-hand hand-to-hand hand-hand,” but granted non-approval for medical care (hereinafter “non-approval for medical care”) on the ground that it is not deemed to have a substantial causal relation with his duties with respect to “the left-hand hand-to-hand hand-hand hand-to-hand hand-hand hand-hand hand-to-hand hand-de salt, and the left-hand hand-on

E. On February 23, 2018, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for reexamination of the disposition, but was dismissed on February 23, 2018.

【Fact-finding without a dispute over recognition, Gap evidence 1, 5, Eul evidence 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion has been as follows: (a) the Plaintiff became a member of the non-party company and performed duties such as calculating the product in the store for about 20 years; (b) ordering, displaying, managing warehouse; and (c

The extent of half of the plaintiff's total working hours is the food transport work, the weight of one gambling room is 15 to 20km, and the characteristics of clothes are given.