성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of the original judgment (one year of suspended execution for four months of imprisonment and forty hours of attending the sexual assault treatment course) is too unreasonable;
2. Where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it (see Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In light of the gravity of the crime in which the victim, who was discharged from all his/her lower court, did not change the conditions of sentencing compared with the judgment of the lower court because new materials for sentencing have not been submitted in the trial, and the victim’s ther ther ther ther ther ther ther ther ther ther ther ther ther m
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.