When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The Defendant, around July 9, 2018, omitted entry of the time of the crime in the facts charged on or around 16:30, but as long as the Defendant does not dispute the time of the crime and consistently appears through the examination, etc. of the witness regarding the time of the crime, it is determined that there is no obstacle to the Defendant’s exercise of the right to defense by adding the time of the crime.

At the B management office in Busan-si B management office, the victim publicly insultd the victim by openly referring to “Admon, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am..

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C, D, and E;

1. C Complaints;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of D and E;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs;