beta
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2015.03.10 2013가단10913

공사대금

Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 25,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from November 1, 2010 to July 15, 2013 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s relationship 1) The Defendant B and the Defendant C filed a marriage report on April 26, 2005 and maintained the legal marital relationship, and concluded a divorce conciliation on July 6, 2011 in the Suwon District Court 201ddan9461, which was pending as Defendant C’s lawsuit filing.

3) According to the above divorce conciliation, the Defendants completed the divorce report on July 25, 201. (B) The Defendants were engaged in beauty art business as they have each beauty art business. The Defendants were living in the beauty art business around August 2002 at the beauty art room located in Seoul around 2004.

2) The Defendants, with the trade name “D” in the Suwon-si, operated the beauty art room in the name of Defendant B from November 13, 2004, up to May 31, 2010, after completing business registration around business registration. 3) After closing the business of “D”, the Defendants again operated the beauty art room in the name of “E” in the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the name of “E” on September 10, 2010, with business registration registered in the name of Defendant C (hereinafter “instant beauty room”).

4) The Plaintiff was commissioned by Defendant B to perform the cosmetic construction from September 3, 2010 to the 20th of the same month. C. A division consultation between the Defendants during the divorce process was underway on June 16, 2011, and the Defendants agreed as follows in relation to the division of property (hereinafter “the first agreement”). The Defendants changed the lessee’s name as to the cosmetic from June 16, 201 to Defendant B with the lessor’s consent, and set up a right to collateral security in Defendant C with the deposit with the lessor’s consent (B) from June 17, 2011 to June 17, 2011, and if the lease contract was terminated due to delinquency in payment for two months or more, the Defendants’ right to collateral security was terminated before the termination of the lease agreement. < Amended by Act No. 10321, Jun. 13, 2011; Act No. 10680, Jun. 17, 2011>