However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is residing in Jeju City B, and the victim C is a person who resides in the next house of the defendant.

At around 21:30 on May 12, 2020, the Defendant came to the house of the victim located in Jeju City D, and did not commit an attempted crime by entering the victim’s house and opening a visit and intrusion into the room through a cret that is not corrected in order to steal the things owned by the victim, using any cres in the victim’s house, and by using the cres that were not corrected in order to steal the things owned by the victim. While using the cres, the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime by getting out of the house the voice of the victim, while using the cres of the victim’s house and printing the stolen objects.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (to hear statements from the victim party by telephone);

1. Articles 342 and 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the victim stated the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for probation and community service order, the possibility of re-offending cannot be ruled out in light of the defendant's past records, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined.