beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.01.07 2013고단183

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a professor at the medical graduate school of D University.

The "E" (E; hereinafter referred to as the "E" (E; hereinafter referred to as the "E") which was developed by the defendant around 1997 is an operation method that restores the function of the bar by fixing the bar in a special production capable of performing functions similar to the bar, and the E operation was applied to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service on March 22, 2007 for new health technology, but on April 24, 2009, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (hereinafter referred to as the "Health Review and Assessment Service") submitted data necessary for research on the safety and effectiveness evaluation of the E operation under the condition that it submits data necessary for research on the safety and effectiveness evaluation of the E operation, and decided to conduct health insurance non-performance and re-evaluation three years after five years after it was decided to conduct research on the E operation under the notification of the Ministry of Health and Welfare (2009-99) on May 29, 2009, the president of the Health Care and Assessment Service recommendation of the E operation under the recommendation of the Korean Special Health and Assessment Service Chairperson.

On August 24, 2010, the victim F was designated as the general manager of the foregoing research as the head of the GOB and ten researchers to conduct research on the safety and effectiveness of the EO operation, and submitted a report on the evaluation and research of the future performance of the EO operation (hereinafter “the report”) to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Health and Welfare, and the Health Review and Assessment Service, etc.