beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.07.25 2013고정535

청소년보호법위반

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was the person who operates a general restaurant, which is a business establishment harmful to juveniles, in the name of "D" in 105 and 106 of the Cheongju-si C building, and the business owner of a business establishment harmful to juveniles did not employ juveniles at a harmful business establishment. On March 9, 2013, from March 18:00 to 20:0 of the same 20:0, the defendant employed juveniles E (F) as employees at the above head office operated by the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Self-statements of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on control of public morals and business report;

1. Article 58 of the Juvenile Protection Act applicable to crimes and Article 58 of the same Act and Article 29 (1) of the same Act (Selection of Fine) of the Juvenile Protection Act;

1. Sentence of a fine not exceeding 700,000 won;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do1148, Apr. 1, 2