except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 20:00 on August 30, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s 112 report of the police officer, the Defendant’s 112 report of dispatch and investigation of crimes, and the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s legitimate performance of official duties in relation to dispatch and investigation of crimes. The Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment 1003, 204, 103 204, and the head of the Gran Police Station D District Group affiliated with D District Group of the Jungran Police Station, which was called upon the report of domestic violence, to listen to the circumstances of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The sentence shall be determined as per the order, taking into consideration the following: (a) there is no criminal record of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) the crime of this case was committed in a contingent manner under the influence of alcohol; and (c) the confession of the crime of this case and reflect in depth;