A. In the course of stopping a vehicle in accordance with the vehicle signal while the defendant was driving a motor vehicle in the Spoty area, the victim B was placed in front, but the defendant did not threaten the victim by blocking the victim's misuse and part of the driver's license or by rapidly driving the vehicle.

In addition, although the defendant made a decoration from a motor vehicle, the defendant did not commit violence by spathing the victim's breath while spathing the victim's breath.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, and the court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 5 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) the victim B made a statement consistent with the facts charged in this case from the police to the court of the court of the court below; (ii) there is no conflict with the contents of the statement or any violation of objective circumstances; and (iii) the video of the victim's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's license.