2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the confession of the crime, the confession of the crime, the fact that there is no record of being punished for the same kind of crime; and (b) the result of the appraisal of the climatics, the fact that the phone was not administered recently, without being aware of the fact that the act of this case was committed during the suspension of the execution period for the climatics; and (c) the fact that the climatics were purchased and administered on several occasions, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.