beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.06.07 2018고단568

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 24, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On April 27, 2012, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court on the ground of a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

The Defendant, as seen above, has violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act twice or more, once again, driven a D Kawn car under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.153% in the section of approximately 8 KK to the uppermost of the 8K-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul at around February 1, 2018, in front of the digital short-term area added to Guro-gu Seoul, Seoul at the street around February 1, 2018.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes (Death and Injury caused before the risk) is a person engaging in driving a DNA car.

On February 1, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.153% during blood transfusions on February 23, 2018, while normal driving is difficult, and continued to drive the said car at a speed that would not be known along the two-lanes between the two-lanes in the direction of the south side of the 84-Mapo-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul.

There are many vehicles and vehicles flowed, and when intending to change course to a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, he/she has a duty of care to inform him/her of the direction, etc. and to prevent accidents without impeding the course of other vehicles, and to change his/her course to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, while neglecting this, the Defendant neglected it and neglected it, but changed the course from the two lanes to the three-lanes, and the Defendant was at the time of the Defendant’s driving’s driving on the three-lane road, and the part of the left side of the E-driving car, which was normally signaled at the three-lane road of the Defendant’s driving, was faced with the victim F (34 years old) who stops in front of the said car.