2. The judgment of the court below is in favor of the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and against the mistake, that there is no benefit acquired by the defendant due to the act of arranging marijuana trade of this case, that the defendant is judged at the same time as the crime of fraud in which the judgment became final and conclusive, and that the defendant should consider equity with the case of the defendant. However, the crime of distributing and administering narcotics is not only a serious crime of causing serious harm and harm to society through serious addiction and propagation of narcotics, but also a serious criminal such as undermining the health of the general public and causing related crimes. Each of the crimes of this case is about 10 times, and it is not good that the defendant assisted the marijuana trade of this case. Despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several times due to the same kind of crime, each of the crimes of this case was committed again during the suspension period, and that some of the crimes was committed during the suspension period of execution, and thus, it cannot be said that the court below's decision is unfair in view of various circumstances such as the circumstances surrounding each crime of this case, the defendant's age and circumstances.