Defendant

On November 22, 2011, Defendants A, C, D, and F’s co-offenders and F’s co-offenders were given the E Association Office located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G building with the instruction of Defendant D and F to the effect that “high white black sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick” was directly given by the president of the Association H, and Defendant A was asked to “high sick sick sick sick sick.” Defendant C received the said instruction from the said H to the same effect.

Therefore, even though Defendants and F judged that they were valuable in appraising the above intention, they prepared a written appraisal resolution under the name of E Association, thereby allowing to issue a certificate of appraisal under the name of E Association.

Accordingly, the Defendants, in collusion with F and H, interfered with the E Association's evaluation of art works by fraudulent means.

B. On February 12, 2008, Defendant A, B, I, and J were given the above H’s instructions to the effect that, in appraising the above E Association’s office, Defendant A, B, I, and J’s 1 false expert testimony, the said E Association’s office “integrative writing,” Defendant A, B, and I, and J were sent through K as the director of the Association Secretariat.”

Therefore, even though Defendants, I, and J judged that they were valuables while appraising the above intention, they prepared a written appraisal resolution as “satisfy,” thereby allowing the E Association to issue a certificate of appraisal under the name of E Association.

Defendants, I, and J issued the E Association’s appraisal certificate with respect to “finites” of a total of five points, as described in the separate sheet of false appraisal, from around that time to July 3, 2008, as well as from around that time.

As a result, the Defendants in collusion with I, J, and H dominent art works of the E Association by fraudulent means.