A. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case is erroneous in erroneous determination of facts, in the absence of the victim's threshold.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (the fine of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On April 3, 2014, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (1) around 11:15 on April 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated that the senior citizen center at the Gu Senior Community Center; (b) required the senior citizen meeting to join the meeting; and (c) see that “the senior citizen center at the Gu Senior Community Center” would be able to see where the victim D would be able to see “the senior citizen’s desire to spons anywhere”; and (b) made the victim’s statement to the effect that “the victim would not sponse sponse sponse sponse sponse spons,” and that the victim’s statement to the effect that the victim’s statement was able to be able to see the victim’s credibility and credibility at the time when the victim’s statement was made, taking into account the following facts: (c) the witness’s statement to the effect that the victim was spicked by the victim’s statement and the victim’s statement.