beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.04.28 2015고단3921

공용물건은닉등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 02:43, October 24, 2015, at around 134, according to the Songpa-gu Seoul Songpa-gu (Seoul), discovered a recyclable 2.50,00 won at the market price, which is the victim’s possession, used by the Songpa-gu community service center at the 1 Dong community service center; and (b) the Defendant concealed and stolen goods used by public offices by putting the Defendant covered by the closure, such as the instant strings, etc., in hand.

2. On October 28, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime at around 04:17, 2015, and around October 28, 2015, up to 16:22 times, according to the same Gu’s order, at the 16:2 of the 17th unit goods storage facilities of the 1st unit. As such, the Defendant concealed and stolen goods used by public offices by placing one recyclable 2.50,00 won at the market price, which is the victim’s possession, used at the 2.5 million unit goods, using the said means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of each written statement, each photograph, investigation report, CCTV video CD-related statute;

1. Article 141 (1) and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are relatively minor, the fact that a living penalty is committed, confessions and reflects, and other factors indicated in the arguments and records of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, etc., shall be comprehensively considered to determine the sentence as ordered.