2. The judgment of the defendant shows the attitude of reflecting the defendant's wrongness, and the fact that the defendant is the primary offender is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant, who was frightened by the Defendant, frightening the victim into the pents in the vicinity of the Defendant, and caused the injury of a brush, which requires approximately six weeks of treatment on the part of the victim’s development, in light of the content of the crime, the background of the crime, and the degree of the victim’s injury, etc., the liability for the crime was not easy and has not been agreed with or has not been recovered from the victim until now.

Considering the above circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendant, and the age, sex, environment, and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.