However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 29, 2017, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol at “C cafeteria” located in Nam-gu, Southern-gu, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, had the victim D (53 tax) dispute. The Defendant divided the victim’s face into five times from the victim to the victim, left the victim’s face over five times due to drinking, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as inside the left side and on the part of the part of the victim, which requires treatment between approximately 21 when the victim’s face was 4 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (in the scene of damage and photographs of victims for damage);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1));

1. An order to attend a lecture under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act ( Taking into account the fact that a person has a previous offense and a previous offense in several times);