However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 23, 2011, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Seoul Northern District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

On May 19, 2020, at around 21:24, the Defendant driven a Grandroth under the influence of alcohol level of approximately 14km from the 14km section to the 2nd underground parking lot of the Namyang-si, Chungcheongnam-si, 1375, the Nam-si.

As a result, the Defendant violated the regulations prohibiting drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of driving under the influence of alcohol, report on the situation of a driver under the influence of alcohol, and inquiry into the results of the crackdown on drinking;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes on criminal records, etc., references to criminal records, amounts of dispositions, reporting on results of confirmation, and summary orders to be attached;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant again commits the crime of this case even if he had a previous conviction of the same kind; the time interval from the previous conviction of the same kind; the defendant's blood alcohol density; the age, character and conduct and environment of the defendant; the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered