beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.07.05 2016고단2945 (2)

주택법위반등

Text

Defendant

A The crimes of paragraphs (1) through (3) of the judgment of A, the crimes of paragraph (4) of the attached list of crimes, and the crimes of paragraphs (66) through (153 of the attached list of crimes, and the crimes of paragraph (5).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on September 13, 2014 by the Daegu District Court on December 12, 2013 for a violation of the Housing Act, etc., and the judgment was finalized on September 13, 2014.

[Criminal facts] 2016 Highest 2945 – Defendant A and B

1. No one shall transfer, acquire, or mediate an occupant's savings account or his/her status in order to have the Defendants acquire, or have others acquire, a house constructed and supplied under the Housing Act;

Defendant

A, with the knowledge of the fact that there is a high probability of winning in the subscription for multi-child households compared to the general supply of multi-child households, after purchasing related documents, such as the subscription passbook, etc., from persons who meet the first priority qualification requirements, and offered that they will acquire apartment proceeds by subscribing for the subscription and selling them in the name of the subscriber of the above subscription passbook, and to purchase the passbook directly from the persons holding the name of the corresponding passbook to the defendant B, and in response to this, the defendant B purchased the necessary documents, such as the passbook, from the funds of the defendant A, and delivered them to the defendant A, and received a price equivalent to one million won per case.

Defendant

B received data to be offered under the above I, such as a comprehensive house subscription form, a certified copy of resident registration, etc., which is an occupant's savings account, from a person eligible for priority order for multi-child special supply in H around March 2015 to March 2, 2015, and paid KRW 4 million as the purchase price. The Defendant A around that time received documents, such as a comprehensive house subscription form, etc., purchased from Defendant B, and paid approximately KRW 1 million to Defendant B.

Defendant

A and Defendant B conspireded to acquire the occupant savings certificate in the name of I or their status.

In addition, from around that time to December 2015, the Defendants were in total as shown in the table of annexed crimes (1) in the same manner.