On December 27, 2016, the Defendant driven a rocketing taxi around 19:19 on December 27, 2016, and proceeded along one lane in the direction of the shooting distance of the next hospital in the basin in which the front crosswalk of Gangnam-gu Seoul is located.

In this case, the driver of a vehicle has a duty of care to reduce speed and safely drive the front door and the right and the right of the vehicle in accordance with the signals and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, when the defendant neglected to do so and proceeded as it is, the defendant's ambry of the victim E ( South, 26 years old) who crosss to the left-hand side of the right-hand side of the mailed with the pedestrian signals.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as her her butt, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. E statements;

1. Video images of crime prevention CCTVs;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The 112 Report Processing List and each investigation report [the defendant and his defense counsel argued that there was no shockion of the victim by the defendant's taxi, but the victim considered that the location of the defendant's taxi wheels runs toward the crosswalk while the defendant's front front part of the taxi was driving (the investigation record 13, 14 pages). The defendant continued to move along the above taxi, unlike the driver of other vehicles where pedestrians stopped on the 2nd and the 3nd stop line even though the pedestrian signal, etc. was green, unlike the driver of other vehicles where the 2nd stop on the 3rd stop line.

In the above situation, the victim continued to look at the defendant as they see while standing the defendant's taxi after the defendant's taxi and the defendant's taxi, and immediately immediately immediately after the occurrence of the above accident, "the taxi has not taken any measure against the contact accident".