1. On May 21, 2016, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around 02:10, the Defendant removed the anti-crime windows (50cm in width, 60cm in length) of the market price (50cm in width, 60cm in length) installed at the toilet window of the above house by breaking back the anti-crime windows (50cm in width, 60cm in length) on his hand, in order to re-enter the above house after the dispute with the victim D (at 24 years in age) who had a relationship with the victim D; and (b) the Defendant, who had left the above house, had changed the entrance door to re-enter the above house; and (c) the Defendant did not comply with the request.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, removed a crime prevention window and moved into the said house through the above toilet window after opening the crime prevention window, as described in paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the above victim's residence.

3. 공무집행 방해 및 상해 피고인은 제 1 항과 같은 날 02:30 경 부천시 원미구 E 소재 부천 원미 경찰서 G 지구대 내에서, 제 1, 2 항 기재 범행으로 현행범 체포되어 위 지구대에 인치된 피고인을 피의자신문하기 위해 피의 자석으로 데리고 가 던 위 지구대 소속 경찰관 피해자 H(28 세) 의 뒷다리를 발로 걸어 넘어뜨려 피해자에게 약 3 주간의 치료가 필요한 뇌진탕 등의 상해를 가하고, 이에 자신에게 수갑을 채우려고 하는 위 지구대 소속 경찰관 I(33 세) 의 얼굴과 다리를 발로 수 회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the management of a new suspect's disease, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with regard to I and H (List 3, 4);

1. A medical certificate of injury (list 8);

1. Application of each investigation report (List 10, 11) statute;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Trade name;