beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.07.11 2019나30772

손해배상(기)

Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. In accordance with the claim for damages for delay added by this court, the Defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a female civilian military employee who worked in the U.S. headquarters M from around 2014 to June 2017 as an external civilian status (Analysis). Around December 2009, when the Plaintiff associated with her husband L and generated children around 2014 after completing a marriage report, the Plaintiff was divorced on September 2018 due to the final and conclusive judgment of divorce. (2) The Defendant LAB published the “J” and the “K” on a regular basis.

Defendant C is a person who served as an intern in J from July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, Defendant D is a vice-president of J, and Defendant E is a director-general of the editing bureau of J.

B. Defendant D, around 2015, reported to Defendant E, the Director-General of the Compilation, that the U.S. military service official of the U.S. Armed Forces in the U.S. serving in the territory of the Republic of Korea was a subordinate employee of the U.S. Armed Forces, and obtained approval for coverage. After gathering articles with Defendant C, Defendant C drafted the relevant articles.

Afterward, Defendant E received articles from Defendant E and revised some contents and received them, and revised them in the editing team.

The final news article was published in J and K on August 15, 2015, respectively, with the same content as the “instant article,” and the detailed news report leading thereto is as follows.

L, the husband of the Plaintiff, worked as a civilian military employee of P of the usfk M headquarters in early 2015, and became aware of the Plaintiff’s commercial relationship with N and the Plaintiff’s sexual content and T.

On March 2015, the Plaintiff filed a divorce lawsuit against L who is her husband by asserting the grounds for divorce such as domestic violence.

L) On June 25, 2015, the purport is that “A person who conspired with the Plaintiff and N and prepares a divorce complaint as if he or she was responsible for the failure of the marriage, and intends to obtain a favorable judgment from the court that is unaware of the circumstances.”