However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 18, 2019, at around 14:30, the Defendant driven D Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do Dok-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. A written appraisal of blood alcohol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (3) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into consideration the various circumstances shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., and the fact that blood alcohol concentration is very high, the circumstances favorable to the occurrence of an accident in the state of saluting: The confession and reflect are made, and about 18 years have elapsed from the last penal power