If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On May 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 20:0 on May 24, 2018, on the ground that the victim D (ma, 54 years of age) did not take a meal at a company’s designated restaurant, the Defendant took a bath on the ground that he did not do so at the meeting of the company’s designated restaurant, and (b) caused an injury on the left part of the part of the victim, which requires the victim’s treatment for about 14 days by driving the victim’s upper part at his left hand, and (c) caused an injury on the left part of the part of the left part, the fluoral salt, the left part of the case.

Defendant

In addition, the defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim stated the facts that he was assaulted by the defendant consistently and specifically until the investigation agency and this court, and there is no room for doubt as to the statement. The victim immediately after the occurrence of this case, the victim stated that he was assaulted by the 3th floor and the police, reported to the police immediately after the occurrence of this case, and the police officer was dispatched by the police, and the victim was dispatched by the police officer after the report to the 2th day after the occurrence of this case, the victim was found at the hospital and the victim was issued with the diagnosis certificate of injury. The investigation agency taken the victim's damaged body photograph and submitted it as evidence, and the victim stated that the victim did not want punishment when he was paid only from the fraud and treatment expenses. The victim stated that the victim did not want the consent of the defendant, not from the situation that the victim demanded the consent of the victim, but from the perspective that it is impossible to recognize the motive of gathering the defendant. The defendant was credibility in the victim's statement as stated in its reasoning.

In addition, the defendant and his defense counsel argued that the degree of injury alleged by the victim is so minor that it is not necessary to receive medical treatment, and therefore it cannot be viewed as an injury that constitutes the elements of the crime of injury. However, according to the victim's medical certificate of injury and photographs of the victim's body of injury.