However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, a similar receiving company in Gangnam-gu Seoul, established a business plan in C (hereinafter referred to as “D”) that is a similar receiving company in Gangnam-gu (hereinafter referred to as “D”), and held a briefing session for the project to attract investors, and E, other than public prosecution, is the chairperson of the above company, and F, as the head of the above company, is a person in charge

The Defendant, in collusion with F and E, did not provide any balance for the purchase of G buildings in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and thus, is uncertain whether the said building can be sold in lots, but F is able to make a profit by 150% for 15 weeks, if the Defendant invested in the said business directly or through the employees of the said company in large number of unspecified persons.

It refers to the defendant, and the defendant has strong significance in the contents and prospects of the project for the above many unspecified people, and E has to receive investment funds from the above unspecified people and to proceed with the project.

1. Fraud;

A. On December 23, 2008, the Defendant, F, and E will pay KRW 15 million to the victim I for 15 weeks by investing the investment of KRW 10 million in the above company’s business in G building development business, etc., through H at the above company’s office.

After making a false statement to the purport that it is “,” the victim and many unspecified persons, including the victim, were demoted as if they could receive revenues from the project promoted by the said company.

However, even if the defendant, F, and E received the above money from the injured party, most of the invested amounts are paid as allowances to superior investors, and G building development projects, etc. explained by the injured party are not yet a stage of making profits, and there was no intention or ability to pay the profits promised to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant, in collusion with F and E, deceiving the victim as above, and is in the name of the above company from the victim.