2. Although there are extenuating circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case and the fact that the defendant is against confinement life, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case using a knife, the degree of injury of the victim, the defendant's knife that he was subject to withdrawal from office due to intimidation of the victim, and the defendant committed the bodily injury of this case, the defendant did not agree with the victim, not only did the defendant agree with the victim but also did not endeavor to recover damage, and all of the sentencing conditions of this case, including the criminal punishment for other crimes similar to the crime of this case, and others, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the above sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.