A. The Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with goods such as equipment and reagents, and received only a part of the price.

B. As of August 31, 2018, the amount of unpaid goods reaches KRW 79,949,890.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1, 2, and 3 (including virtual numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 79,949,890 payable to the Plaintiff and the amount of 6% per annum as prescribed by the Commercial Act from September 1, 2018 to July 26, 2019, the service date of the original copy of the instant payment order, and 12% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the day of full payment.

3. The defendant's argument regarding the defendant's assertion is without merit since the defendant's defect exists in the RSV test key among the goods supplied by the plaintiff, and the damage occurred to the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff's unpaid claim for the price of goods and the defendant's claim for compensation for damage should be offset on an equal amount, or there is no evidence to prove that there is a defect in the above test key supplied by the plaintiff. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

4. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.