공사대금
1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of Paragraph 1 of the same Article, and thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4
2. Judgment on the plaintiff's main claim
A. (1) The reasons for this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion are as follows. The reasons for this part of the judgment of the first instance are as follows.
(1) Since it is identical to the statement in paragraph (1), it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(2) (A) The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the installation of a septic tank is as follows, except for the addition of the following:
(2)(a) Since it is identical to the entry in subsection (a), it shall be quoted as it is in accordance with the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[추가하는 부분] ▣ 제1심 판결문 제7쪽 제17행 “받아들일 수 없다” 다음에 아래를 추가한다.
(B) The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is with the exception of adding the following: (a) although the Plaintiff asserted that the construction of a septic tank was the Defendant’s business, and it constitutes a business management because the Plaintiff performed the construction without any obligation. However, there is no evidence to prove that the construction was the Defendant’s business; (b) this part of the construction of a septic tank is the Defendant’s business.
(2) Since it is identical to the entry in subsection (b), it shall be quoted as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[추가하는 부분] ▣ 제1심 판결문 제8쪽 제19행 “받아들이기 어렵다” 다음에 아래를 추가한다.
The plaintiff asserted that the defendant did not pay this part of the construction cost even though he was compelled to perform the transit construction work to the plaintiff. However, the expenses claimed by the plaintiff are already reflected in the settlement of accounts.
(C) The reasoning for this part of the part concerning the re-establishment of the protective device is as follows.
(2)(c) Because it is the same as described in paragraph (c), it shall be quoted as it is in accordance with the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
B. The reasoning for this part of the transmission of the tender price in the channel is as follows, 2-B of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition of the following:
2.2.2.2.2.2.2.