매매대금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the court shall use "the plaintiff" of 4th 13th 13th son of the judgment of the court of first instance as "the defendant"; and (b) the plaintiff's dual mutual aid proposal in this court is identical to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The Plaintiff added the portion of the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant’s repayment assertion was deducted from the purchase price pursuant to the Plaintiff’s letter of payment assurance as of March 23, 2017, from the purchase price of the Gangwon-do K land shares (hereinafter “K land shares”), and thus, the Defendant’s assertion to the effect that the Defendant’s assertion for repayment is unreasonable.
The written evidence evidence Nos. 9 and 10 alone is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's above assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.
Rather, in light of the overall purport of the evidence presented earlier, the Plaintiff: (a) around January 2018, against the Defendant and C Co., Ltd., KRW 196,476,00; (b) KRW 46,827,00; and (c) KRW 198,40,700; and (c) KRW 441,703,00; (b) KRW 40,000; and KRW 8,976,00; (c) KRW 93,149,190; (d) KRW 208; and (e) KRW 70,50; and (e) KRW 86,50; and (e) KRW 86,70; and (e) KRW 70,50; and (g) KRW 86,50; and (g) KRW 70,50; and (g) KRW 80,50,000; and (g) KRW 860,50, etc. of the instant land.