2. The lower court, under the circumstances favorable to the Defendant’s confession and reflection of the crime, committed a self-denunciation after the crime, has the record of punishment more than five times, including the criminal records of the same kind, and committed another crime during the period of a repeated crime, taking into account the unfavorable circumstances, determined the sentence within the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines, taking into account the following factors: the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the following circumstances.

The grounds for the improper sentencing (a confession, reflectivity, and self-denunciation) alleged by the Defendant appears to be the grounds for the lower court having already considered the punishment for the Defendant, and otherwise, the above conditions of sentencing have changed.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is determined to be reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.